Trump derangement

0
petem@chartermi.net
Sep 19, 2023 05:23 PM 0 Answers General
Member Since Sep 2023
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

Professor,

I saw you on the Donahue show in the late 1980’s maybe early 90’s.  You were defending the free speech rights of Luther Campbell of 2 Live Crew. I was in my early 20’s and understood right away, you were defending the right of the man, not the man.
Does Larry David (and others) really not understand that???

1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
Sort By:

Trump derangement

0
petem@chartermi.net
Sep 19, 2023 04:52 PM 0 Answers General
Member Since Sep 2023
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

Professor,

I saw you on the Donahue show in the late 1980’s maybe early 90’s.  You were defending the free speech rights of Luther Campbell of 2 Live Crew. I was in my early 20’s and understood right away, you were defending the right of the man, not the man.
Does Larry David (and others) really not understand that???

1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
Sort By:

Trump derangement

0
petem@chartermi.net
Sep 19, 2023 04:51 PM 0 Answers General
Member Since Sep 2023
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

Professor,

I saw you on the Donahue show in the late 1980’s maybe early 90’s.  You were defending the free speech rights of Luther Campbell of 2 Live Crew. I was in my early 20’s and understood right away, you were defending the right of the man, not the man.
Does Larry David (and others) really not understand that???

1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
Sort By:

Trump derangement

0
petem@chartermi.net
Sep 19, 2023 04:51 PM 0 Answers General
Member Since Sep 2023
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

Professor,

I saw you on the Donahue show in the late 1980’s maybe early 90’s.  You were defending the free speech rights of Luther Campbell of 2 Live Crew. I was in my early 20’s and understood right away, you were defending the right of the man, not the man.
Does Larry David (and others) really not understand that???

1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
Sort By:

Trump derangement

0
petem@chartermi.net
Sep 19, 2023 04:50 PM 0 Answers General
Member Since Sep 2023
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

Professor,

I saw you on the Donahue show in the late 1980’s maybe early 90’s.  You were defending the free speech rights of Luther Campbell of 2 Live Crew. I was in my early 20’s and understood right away, you were defending the right of the man, not the man.
Does Larry David (and others) really not understand that???

1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
Sort By:

Impeachment Inquiry

0
rogsonl
Sep 13, 2023 10:08 AM 0 Answers General
Member Since Sep 2023
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

On Sep 13 you stated the Republican impeachment inquiry was not on constitutional grounds.

Bribery is one of the grounds mentioned. Why, with the amount of information the House has gathered, is it unconstitutional to investigate whether the pattern shown as VP does not extend to his current Presidential status?

Separately. Can one impeach a past VP and make him ineligible for this current post as President? If not, aren't we allowing politicians to play with time in their favor, as some of us think they did after the last (to them) fraudulent election?

Love your podcast, even when I disagree with your opinions once in a while. We both seem to be Kennedy Democrats.

1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
Sort By:

[Private] Statute of Limitations with the IRS

Sorry you can't access to private question

Conflicting Positions

0
kdwilbanks@gmail.com
Aug 22, 2023 07:22 AM 0 Answers General
Member Since Aug 2023
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

Professor Dershowitz:

I enjoy your books, media appearances, and your podcast.  Lately, I have seen what I view as a strong disagreement between your own positions.  You have stated that you are not comfortable with the current state of the DOJ regarding how they are handling various major cases; however, you refuse to support the political party which is being attacked with these improper actions.  If you continue to support the current ruling (an intentional, questionable use of this word) political party, you are not using your platform to lead to a correction of these activities.

I look forward to reading your new book and I use the availability of that book as a determination of whether or not I will purchase anything from a local bookstore .

Keep up the good work,

K.D.

 

1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
Sort By:

Devil Turning ‘Round

0
JustaLawyer
Aug 21, 2023 11:10 PM 0 Answers General
Member Since Aug 2023
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

I know this is a literary reference that has probably been beaten to death, but am I the only one who thinks the obsessive desire to “get Trump” at all costs, even that  of the constitution, proves  the wisdom of the famous scene from “man for all seasons” in which, Sir Thomas More  explains why he would give the devil benefit of the law? (BTW, I don’t believe Trump is the devil.)

1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
Sort By:

Did Ed Armbrister interfere with Carlton Fisk in 1975

0
Anonymous
Jun 04, 2023 08:20 PM 0 Answers General
Member Since Jan 1970
Unsolved Solved Mark as Solved Mark as Unsolved
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

Did Ed Armbrister interfere with Carlton Fisk in 1975.

Armbrister did not move out of the way but really didn't look like he did something deliberate. What is the rule.

0 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
Sort By: