Sorry you can't access to private question
Question Category: General
General
0
kdwilbanks@gmail.com
Professor Dershowitz:
I enjoy your books, media appearances, and your podcast. Lately, I have seen what I view as a strong disagreement between your own positions. You have stated that you are not comfortable with the current state of the DOJ regarding how they are handling various major cases; however, you refuse to support the political party which is being attacked with these improper actions. If you continue to support the current ruling (an intentional, questionable use of this word) political party, you are not using your platform to lead to a correction of these activities.
I look forward to reading your new book and I use the availability of that book as a determination of whether or not I will purchase anything from a local bookstore .
Keep up the good work,
K.D.
1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
0
JustaLawyer
I know this is a literary reference that has probably been beaten to death, but am I the only one who thinks the obsessive desire to “get Trump” at all costs, even that of the constitution, proves the wisdom of the famous scene from “man for all seasons” in which, Sir Thomas More explains why he would give the devil benefit of the law? (BTW, I don’t believe Trump is the devil.)
1 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers
0
Anonymous
Did Ed Armbrister interfere with Carlton Fisk in 1975.
Armbrister did not move out of the way but really didn't look like he did something deliberate. What is the rule.
0 Subscribers
Submit Answer
0 Answers